Professor of Economics, Tripura University, Agartala, Tripura
The
process of globalisation was for, all practical purposes,
set in 1991 in India for the country as a whole. Due to vastness and the
diverse nature of the country, the impact of globalisation across the space and
time has been quite different for different regions.
The Northeastern states with its geographic
isolation and communication bottlenecks has responded to the reforms in
its own
way.
An
attempt has been made to scrutinise the employment scenario of women in the
Northeastern states during the globalised regime. In order to study the
situation, the two sets of data collected under National Family Health Survey at
two different points of time at 1992-93 (NFHS-1)
and 1998-1999 (NFHS-2) – were scanned. NFHS-1 was conducted when the
process of globalisation just started. And after the elapse of six and half
year,
NFHS-2
was undertaken. It is, therefore, expected that a scrutiny of two sets of
data
is likely to register the changes, if ever occurred
during
the period. The two data sets – namely NFHS-1 and NFHS-2 consist of
huge information on many dimensions of
women’s life including the status of women, their education, employment
and the standard of living etc. In this study, only a few indicators such as the
mass media exposure of women in the Northeastern states, their employment and
work-status were compared for the two sets of data of NFHS-1 and NFHS-2. The
indicator of mass media exposure of women has been treated as the proxy variable
for measuring the extent of globalisation taking place in the parts of the
Northeastern Region of India. The work status of the women namely working in the
family farm or business, employment by someone else, self-employment and not
working in past 12 months has also been examined for the two periods for the
purpose of comparison and contrast.
A
cursory look into the two data sets confirms that thirty seven percent of ever-
married women
age 15 – 49 are currently employed which is up from 32 percent in
NFHS-1 by 5 points in India. During the same period, the percentage of employed
women in Nagaland increased from 43.7% to 62.8% registering an increase of 19.1
points. All other states except Tripura recorded increase in the
level of employment during the period. The table below gives the picture
for the Northeastern states along with India.
Table
: 1
Percent
distribution of ever-married women age 15-49 by employment characteristics
State
|
NFHS-1 |
NFHS
– 2 |
Increase/Decrease |
|
Arunachal
Pradesh |
44.9 |
58.8 |
+13.9 |
|
Manipur |
53.5 |
61.0 |
+7.5 |
|
Meghalaya |
41.8 |
45.9 |
+4.1 |
|
Mizoram |
33.2 |
47.9 |
+14.7 |
|
Nagaland |
43.7 |
62.8 |
+19.1 |
|
Tripura |
25.7 |
22.0 |
-3.7 |
|
Assam |
18.0 |
19.5 |
+1.5 |
|
India |
32.0 |
37.0 |
+5 |
Table-1
shows that in the case of Tripura, the percent of women employed declined by 3.7
points. The least growth in employment occurred in Assam which is up only by 1.5
point. The growth of employment of women in all the states except Assam and
Tripura vary between 4.1 to 19.1 points in terms of growth of women employment.
Arunachal Pradesh, Manipur, Mizoram and Nagaland are found to be ahead of all
India average.
The
better performances of Arunachal Pradesh
(+13.9), Mizoram (+14.7) and Nagaland (+19.1) in providing more
employment for women are ostensibly due to the higher level of media exposure of
women in the respective states. Table-2 below gives the media exposure scenario
by the different states of Northeastern states.
Table:2
Exposure
to mass media
Percentage
of ever-married women age 15-49 who usually watch TV or listen
to
the radio at least once a week.
|
Arunachal
Pradesh |
|
Watching
TV |
Listening
Radio
|
Urban |
82.1 (47.7) + 34.4 |
53.8 (50.0) +33.8 |
|
|
Rural |
40.9 (25.4) 15.5 |
39.1 (39.1) 0.0 |
|
|
Manipur |
Urban |
82.1 (55.7) +26.4 |
76.9 (74.3) +2.6 |
|
Rural |
50.5 (29.9) +20.6 |
70.4 (57.7) +12.7 |
|
|
Meghalaya |
Urban |
82.8 (68.3) +14.5 |
47.2 (57.9) -10.7 |
|
Rural |
28.9 (13.1) +15.8 |
36.9 (32.6) +4.3 |
|
|
Mizoram |
Urban |
64.8 (41.0) +23.8 |
70.0 (67.7) +3.3 |
|
Rural |
20.8 (9.8) +11.0 |
63.0 (42.8) +20.2 |
|
|
Nagaland |
Urban |
82.8 (59.2) +23.6 |
53.9 (69.6) -15.7 |
|
Rural |
36.8 (12.9) +23.9 |
42.1 (35.2) +6.9 |
|
|
Tripura |
Urban |
82.8 (71.5) +11.3 |
53.9 (75.6) -21.7 |
|
Rural |
43.1 (24.9) +18.2 |
37.5 (52.0) -14.5 |
Source
: NFHS-1 and NFHS-2
It
is seen from Table – 2 that due to the rapid urbanisation and spreading of
mass media horizontally and vertically
among the womenfolk, the states in which women are widely exposed to mass
media, thanks to globalisation are also ahead of other states in terms of growth
of women employment. For example, Nagaland has an increase of percent of women
watching TV by 23.6 points in urban area and 23.9 points in rural area, has also
profound
increase in percent of women employment by +19.1 points. Of course, a
fall in the percent of women listening radio in Nagaland is perhaps due to
overwhelming penetration of TV network over the state. The same explanation
seems to hold good for other states of Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh. This
phenomenon highlights the fact that where globalisation tends to take place as
reflected
in the proxy indicator of mass media exposure, the employment prospects
also improve. The notion held by many that globalisation, helps expand the level
of employment of women is found basis to believe.
An
inquiry into the work status of
women reveals some interesting insights which, too are consistent with
the globalisation and employment nexus. Table-3 gives the work
status report of women, according to the categories of working in family
farm business, employed by someone else, self employed and not worked in past 12
months etc.
Percent distribution of ever-married women age 15-49 by work status (figures represent NFHS-2 data and figures in brackets represent NFHS-1 data)
|
State |
Working
in Family farm/business |
Employed
by some one else |
Self
employed |
Not
worked in past 12 months |
|
Arunachal
Pradesh |
37.7 (18.6) |
7.9 (7.7) |
13.9 (18.6) |
40.4 (55.1) |
|
Manipur |
22.9 (17.7) |
18.6 (11.6) |
28.4 (24.1) |
30.1 (46.5) |
|
Meghalaya |
18.6 (16.6) |
20.1 (18.2) |
8.8 (6.9) |
52.4 (58.2) |
|
Mizoram |
23.5 (15.3) |
19.2 (11.7) |
7.2 (6.2) |
50.1 (66.8) |
|
Nagaland |
37.3 (15.1) |
14.8 (5.1) |
11.7 (23.5) |
36.1 (56.3) |
|
Tripura |
5.2 (10.3) |
14.4 (12.9) |
3.1 (2.5) |
77.3 (74.3) |
|
Assam |
4.8 |
10.8 |
4.5 |
79.8 |
|
India |
14.4 |
19.7 |
5.0 |
60.8 |
Source
: NFHS-1 and NFHS-2.
It
is clearly observed that Arunachal Pradesh has registered increases of 19.1
points in working in family farm/business, 0.2 points in
employed by someone else and a decline of 4.7 points in self employed
categories respectively . For Manipur, Meghalaya, Mizoram and Nagaland, there is
a overall increase of points in all categories ranging from 1.9 to 5.2.
It is further observed that the percentage of women not worked in past 12
months declined for all the states except Tripura. With the globalisation set
in, the more employment opportunities are being created. As a result, women find
scope for employment to get themselves absorbed . Here again, the rankings of
the state, according to more opportunities of employment created during the past
12 months are as follows:-
Nagaland
(20.4), Mizoram (16.7), Manipur (16.4) Arunachal Pradesh (14.7), Meghalaya (5.8)
and Tripura (-3.0)
Conclusions
If
the level of employment of ever-married women in the Northeastern states
is juxtaposed upon the on-going globalisation process as reflected by the level
of mass media exposure, it is found that a state which has wide coverage of mass
media exposure, a proxy variable for the index of globalisation, is better
placed in terms of women employment. Women
in the region (except Tripura) are found to have themselves engaged more
in their own family farm or
business. Data from NFHS-1 and NFHS-2 also suggest that in spite of the growth
of sectors of employed by someone else and self employed, their contributions in
providing employment for women in those areas are not worth to mention.
A comparative study of the two sets of data of NFHS-1 and NFHS-2, however, suggests that the impact of globalisation in employment generation for women in the Northeastern states is significantly substantial with a clear implication that more globalisation entails higher level of employment.